Featured
NeuroNews
16 February

Some people can concentrate for long periods of time, while others are easily distracted, and this, according to new research, may be because we all lie somewhere on an attention-distractibility spectrum, with people who suffer from Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) being at one extreme of it.

Sophie Forster of the University of Sussex and Nilli Lavie of University College London recruited 100 healthy undergraduate volunteers, and asked them to perform a computerized visual search test in which they had to find a 'target' letter within a circle of others.

The test varied in difficulty, with some of the targets being placed within a circle of other similar letters, making them harder to find. In some of the trials, the letters where shown with an irrelevant and distracting cartoon image beside them.

The researchers found that their participants' performance varied widely. Some were far more easily distracted by the cartoons than others, as determined by the time it took them to correctly identify the target letter. The more difficult version of the test eliminated this distraction.

Afterwards, all the participants filled out a self-report form designed to measure the extent to which they experienced ADHD-like symptoms in their childhood. This revealed a close link between childhood symptoms and distractibility during the lab test, with those reporting more symptoms being the most easily distracted.

In a second experiment, 101 other volunteers were asked to perform a similar test, this time involving the names of superheroes and other fictional characters, and without a more difficult version. Confirming the results of the first experiment, Forster and Lavie found large individual differences in performance, which again were closely correlated with the participants' self-reports of ADHD-like symptoms in childhood.

"We find that peoples' self-reports of their ADHD-like symptoms in childhood predict the level of distraction they experience in adulthood," says Lavie. "That's why we think attention-distractibility is a long-lasting trait. Otherwise, how would childhood symptoms predict their performance?"

Lavie adds that attention-distractibility may be a 'core' personality trait that persists through life, and this could explain the observed individual differences in the extent to which healthy people can focus their attention.

Attention acts as a 'gateway' to information processing in the brain, because stimuli that aren't attended to do not enter into conscious awareness. People diagnosed with ADHD typically underachieve at school, and are more prone to accidents in daily life. Similarly, distractibility scores predict the likelihood of work and car accidents in healthy people. The observation that the more difficult version of the tests eliminated distraction in all participants, regardless of the extent of their self-reported childhood ADHD-like symptoms, suggests that cognitive training could help people to focus their attention more.

"We are now working on establishing the distraction test as a commercial product," says Lavie. "We are looking to help people with non-clinical ADHD symptoms to learn more about themselves."

Featured
NeuroNews
16 February

A rare side effect of smoking weed is experiencing psychosis or paranoia; researchers have identified a gene variant that predicts a person's risk for this happening.

In a new study of more than 400 healthy young stoners with no family history of psychosis, people with a variant of this gene experienced more mind-altering symptoms when they were high. Although such symptoms are temporary, they might signal higher risk for developing psychotic disorders in the future.

"To find that having this gene variant means that you are more prone to mind-altering affects of cannabis when you don't have psychosis gives us a clue as to how it increases risk in healthy people," coauthor Celia Morgan, of the University of Exeter, said in a statement. "Putting yourself repeatedly in a psychotic or paranoid state might be one reason why these people could go on to develop psychosis when they might not have done otherwise."

Previous research has suggested that cannabis can bump up the risk for psychotic disorders like schizophrenia in a small fraction of its users. People with a family history of psychosis are also more sensitive to the temporary mind-altering effects that can accompany marijuana use, such as hallucinations or delusions.

One variant of a gene called AKT1 may underlie this vulnerability. Among people who carry two copies of this version of the gene, a history of cannabis use is linked with heightened risk of developing psychosis.

The people in these studies had all experienced psychosis or schizophrenia, or had a sibling with schizophrenia. In the new experiment, researchers in the United Kingdom wanted to find out whether this gene might also exert an influence on stoners with no family history of psychosis.

The team gathered 422 people between the ages of 16 and 23 who used cannabis at least once a month, and told them to abstain for 24 hours before two testing days a week apart.

One of those days, the participants stayed sober. They completed a few questionnaires and short-term memory tests, as well as providing samples of urine and hair (which offers a picture of drug use over the past several months).

On the other day, the scientists told the participants to get high. The participants prepped their cannabis (this experiment was BYO weed) and offered up a 0.3-gram sample to be analyzed for its composition.

"The participant then smoked cannabis in front of the experimenter who told participants to smoke at their usual inhalation rate, and to smoke as much as they would normally do to feel 'stoned.' At this point, the testing began," wrote the researchers, who published the findings today in the journal Translational Psychiatry.

The researchers used cheek swabs to find out whether participants had one, two, or zero copies of the variant of AKT1.

The more copies someone had of this gene variant, the more likely they were to have mind-altering symptoms while stoned. A person's gender, ethnicity, years of cannabis use, cannabis dependence or marijuana composition did not predict whether they would have these symptoms.

On the memory test, gender alone was related to how well people did. On the more difficult part of the test, women's performance took a hit when they were stoned.

"Animal studies have found that males have more of the receptors that cannabis works on in parts of the brain important in short term memory, such as the prefrontal cortex," Morgan said. "Our findings indicate that men could be less sensitive to the memory impairing effects of cannabis than females."

Cannabis did have stronger effects on the users who smoked less often, and a higher proportion of women than men were infrequent users. So it's possible that differences in how much men and women regularly toked up played a role this disparity, too.

The findings are the first to connect the AKT1 gene in healthy people with a temporary psychosis-like response to marijuana, which scientists consider a marker for developing psychosis later on. This gene, and the proteins it codes for, could be investigated for developing new treatments for cannabis-induced psychosis, the researchers said.